TAAT EVALUATION OF PARTNERS; OFSP ASPECTS, INFLUENCE ON COMMUNITY AND COVID19 EFFECTS

Description	Results
Interview period	09-Nov-2021 to 28-Nov-2021
Total number of Respondents	50 (Male:0 Female:0)
Number of Districts/ ADDs/ LGAs	22

p5. Interviewed partner representatives categorised by sex [All Countries]

Code	Description	Freq	Percent
00	Female	21	42.00
01	Male	29	58.00
	Overall	50	100.00

p7. Designations of partner representatives interviewed [All Countries]

Code	Description	Freq	Percent
07	Owner/ Founder	3	6.00
95	Other	27	54.00
01	Monitoring and Evaluation	2	4.00
03	Agricultural Officer	12	24.00
02	Health Worker	4	8.00
05	Managing Director	1	2.00
06	CEO	1	2.00
	Overall	50	100.00

p8. Number of staff of the partner organization/entity directly engaged in OFSP value chains [All Countries]

Code	Description	Freq	Percent
03	10-49 Employees	20	40.00
04	50-249 Employees	3	6.00
01	1-4 Employees	12	24.00
02	5-9 Employees	10	20.00
05	250 employees or more	5	10.00
	Overall	50	100.00

p9. Aspects of the OFSP value chain partners are engaged in [All Countries]

Note: results are from multiple-choice responses
Code	Description	Freq	Percent
11	Value addition	24	9.02
03	Vine supply to beneficiaries/ vine buying from vine multipliers	30	11.28
01	Sweetpotato breeding	9	3.38
06	Pest and disease management	15	5.64
07	Harvest and Post-harvest management	15	5.64
08	Marketing of OFSP	25	9.40
12	Nutrition	19	7.14
13	Technology dissemination	19	7.14
14	Advocacy	18	6.77
15	Research (general)	13	4.89
16	Policy	5	1.88
09	Processing of OFSP	23	8.65
10	Livestock feeding e.g through use of silage	11	4.14
02	Input supply	13	4.89
04	Soil fertility management	8	3.01
05	Soil and water conservation	9	3.38
95	Other	10	3.76
	Overall	266	100.00

p10. Aspects of the OFSP value chain in which partners collaborates with CIP/TAAT project [All Countries]

Note: results are from multiple-choice responses
Code	Description	Freq	Percent
11	Value addition	19	10.44
03	Vine supply to beneficiaries/ vine buying from vine multipliers	26	14.29
01	Sweetpotato breeding	5	2.75
15	Research (general)	8	4.40
09	Processing of OFSP	19	10.44
06	Pest and disease management	9	4.95
07	Harvest and Post-harvest management	11	6.04
08	Marketing of OFSP	17	9.34
10	Livestock feeding e.g through use of silage	7	3.85
13	Technology dissemination	16	8.79
12	Nutrition	16	8.79
04	Soil fertility management	3	1.65
05	Soil and water conservation	5	2.75
14	Advocacy	11	6.04
02	Input supply	9	4.95
16	Policy	1	0.55
	Overall	182	100.00

p12. Why is it important for partners to collaborate with CIP/TAAT on OFSP aspects [All Countries]

Note: results are from multiple-choice responses
Code	Description	Freq	Percent
01	Promoting OFSP- Orange Fleshed Sweetpotato	39	29.10
95	Other	27	20.15
03	Promoting Vitamin A intake	36	26.87
02	Reducing Malnutrition	32	23.88
	Overall	134	100.00

p17a. Have partner activities implemented with CIP been affected by COVID-19? [All Countries]

Code	Description	Freq	Percent
01	Yes	43	86.00
00	No	7	14.00
	Overall	50	100.00

p17b. In what ways were partner activities implemented with CIP been affected by COVID-19? [All Countries]

Note: results are from multiple-choice responses
Code	Description	Freq	Percent
03	Difficulty in getting raw materials	12	9.76
95	Other Reasons (Specify)	20	16.26
04	Travel restrictions made it difficult to implement project	25	20.33
05	Government forced closure complicated the implementation	19	15.45
02	Difficulty in finding labour	12	9.76
06	Limiting number of people per vehicle made implementation more expensive	14	11.38
01	Most of target groups had Covid-19	2	1.63
07	Reducing number of staff in offices	8	6.50
08	Many product suppliers closed business	11	8.94
	Overall	123	100.00

p18. Suggestion on how partners collaboration with CIP/TAAT can be strengthened [All Countries]

Note: results are from multiple-choice responses
Code	Description	Freq	Percent
01	Increase Funding	28	22.22
03	Increase number of trainings	36	28.57
04	Provide brochures and Leaflets	15	11.90
95	Other	26	20.63
02	Improve on Communications	21	16.67
	Overall	126	100.00